US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 11,298
Austin v. Jostes et al
as 3:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Ladarreon Austin
Defendant:
Jordan Jostes, B Wells and Liu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armour v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00356
Petitioner:
Rickey R Armour
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Morales
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Billy Williams
Defendant:
Morales
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boards v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Carl R Webb II Boards and Carl Roy Webb II Boards
Defendant:
Loren, Arron Smith, Brian English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Mayes
as 3:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Billy Asher Wilson
Defendant:
Jacqueline Mayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Shafer et al
as 2:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Cory David Brown
Defendant:
Shafer, Christina Reagel, Devine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Shafer et al
as 3:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Cory David Brown
Defendant:
Shafer, Christina Reagel, Devine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Redding
as 3:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Thomas Brian Johnson
Defendant:
Timothy Redding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Staton et al
as 3:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Victor D Phillips, Jr
Defendant:
Brock M. Staton, M Lester and M Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hallahan v. Rayl et al
as 3:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joesph Hallahan
Defendant:
Kevin Rayl, Justin Bertrand, Johnathan Crow-Eby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
