US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Labor Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 202
HILL v. COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO
as 1:2021cv02075
Plaintiff:
RODNEY HILL
Defendant:
Coca-Cola Bottling Company Consolidated and COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
MORRIS v. STEEL DYNAMICS, INC. et al.
as 1:2021cv01953
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Morris
Defendant:
Jonathan Plemons and STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
WARD v. FLAHERTY & COLLINS, INC.
as 1:2021cv01296
Plaintiff:
TEISA L. WARD
Defendant:
FLAHERTY & COLLINS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
BEASLEY v. INDIANA BUREAU OF MOTOR VEHICLES
as 1:2021cv01172
Defendant:
INDIANA BUREAU OF MOTOR VEHICLES
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
KEEN v. OHIO VALLEY NATURAL GAS COMPANY et al
as 1:2021cv01048
Defendant:
OHIO VALLEY GAS INC., SCOTT INGRAM, OHIO VALLEY NATURAL GAS COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
JO ANN KEEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
ROBERTSON v. IRVING MATERIALS INCORPORATED
as 1:2021cv00177
Defendant:
INC. IRVING MATERIALS and IRVING MATERIALS INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
Austin Robertson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
GIBBS v. NSK CORPORATION
as 1:2020cv03282
Defendant:
NSK CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO GIBBS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
STEWART v. NTN BEARING CORPORATION OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv03281
Defendant:
NTN BEARING CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN STEWART
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
GALLO v. TIMBERLAND HOME CENTER, INC. a/k/a TIMBERLAND LUMBER COMPANY
as 2:2020cv00664
Plaintiff:
CAMERON M. GALLO
Defendant:
TIMBERLAND HOME CENTER, INC. a/k/a TIMBERLAND LUMBER COMPANY, TIMBERLAND HOME CENTER, INC. and TIMBERLAND LUMBER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612
BENNETT v. MAGNA POWERTRAIN OF AMERICA, INC.
as 1:2020cv03024
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Bennett
Defendant:
MAGNA POWERTRAIN OF AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
