Indiana Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 7,162
Valencia v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Mysti Valencia
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Jason Nowatzke, Christopher Beal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WEBER v. ALLDREDGE
as 3:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
PAMELA K. WEBER
Defendant:
STEVEN JAMES ALLDREDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PEDEN v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
DEANGELO PEDEN
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, CHIEF RANDAL TAYLOR, OFFICER BRENT TURNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Douglas v. Kreager et al
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY K. DOUGLAS
Defendant:
KRISTOPHER KREAGER, John/Jane Does Unknown, CITY OF COLUMBIA CITY and others
Other:
Anthony Stites
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Taebel v. Swift
as 2:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
Taylor Swift and Taylor Alison Swift
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Catalano v. Starke County of
as 3:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Michael Catalano
Defendant:
The County of Starke Indiana and Starke County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OJO v. WE PEBBLE POINT, LLC
as 1:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
JIBOLA OJO
Defendant:
WE PEBBLE POINT, LLC doing business as PEBBLE POINT APARTMENTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
Caparelli v. Town of Merrillville et al
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Alycia Caparelli
Defendant:
Town of Merrillville, Lt. James Bogner, Dr. Zhuo Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAXEY v. POTTER et al
as 1:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
VANCE GERALD MAXEY
Defendant:
BRENT POTTER, DOYLE & FOUTTY, U S BANK N A and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taebel v. Biden
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
