Eighth Circuit Social Security Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 31,116
Clark v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Matthew L. Clark
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Vojchehoske v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Steven Vojchehoske
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Gibson v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2024cv02033
Plaintiff:
Albert Walter Gibson, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Newbern v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv00867
Plaintiff:
Melvin Henry Newbern
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Thomas v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Thomas
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Brooks v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Bridget Brooks
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Brooks v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Bridget Brooks
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Campbell v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Erin E. Campbell
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kepner v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv06035
Plaintiff:
Angela Rene Kepner
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Barber v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Christina Barber
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1381 a Supplemental Security Income benefits (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
