US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Carthan v. Birch Tree Communities, Inc.
as 6:2024cv06126
Defendant:
Birch Tree Communities, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary Carthan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Main v. WalMart, Inc.
as 5:2024cv05172
Defendant:
WalMart, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hunter Main
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
McKenzie v. National Park College
as 6:2024cv06096
Plaintiff:
Kenita McKenzie
Defendant:
National Park College
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Hardnett v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01045
Plaintiff:
Brandy Hardnett
Defendant:
Murphy Oil USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Weston v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
as 5:2024cv05050
Plaintiff:
Ashley Weston
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Woods v. Little River County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2023cv04036
Plaintiff:
Michelle Woods
Defendant:
Little River County, Arkansas and Deanna Sivley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Glover v. Hudson Memorial Nursing Home
as 1:2022cv01072
Plaintiff:
Jacinda Glover
Defendant:
Hudson Memorial Nursing Home
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Floyd v. UL, LLC
as 5:2022cv05112
Plaintiff:
Brandon Floyd
Defendant:
UL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Hensley v. Windstream Communications, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv03003
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Sue Hensley
Defendant:
Windstream Communications, LLC, Windstream Services, LLC and Windstream Services, II, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Marcum v. Preformed Line Products Company
as 5:2021cv05180
Plaintiff:
Bradley Marcum
Defendant:
Preformed Line Products Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
