Arkansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,439
Dixon v. Roberts
as 1:2024cv01032
Plaintiff:
Darius Santwann Dixon
Defendant:
Sheriff Ricky Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirkpatrick v. Does
as 4:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Skyler Kirkpatrick
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Westlake v. Eureka Springs Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv03024
Plaintiff:
Emerson Tron Westlake
Defendant:
Eureka Springs Police Department, Tim Holm and Does Officers, Eureka Springs Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Westlake v. Eureka Springs Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Emerson Tron Westlake
Defendant:
Eureka Springs Police Department, Tim Holm and Does Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Amber Johnson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Solomon Graves and N Faust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pullen v. Bruce
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Wendel Pullen
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manning v. Shock et al
as 4:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Shaleen Cecile Manning
Defendant:
Andy Shock and Lona McCastlain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clemons v. McSlone (#118) et al
as 6:2024cv06061
Plaintiff:
Ovell Daniel Clemons, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer McSlone (#118), Officer Ramirez (#171), Officer Gibson (#105) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pratt v. Barker et al
as 1:2024cv01028
Plaintiff:
Barry Michael Pratt, Jr.
Defendant:
District Judge Jack Barker, Chief Deputy Charlie Phillips and Sheriff Ricky Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilder v. Cestui Que Trust
as 4:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
Craig Bernard Wilder
Defendant:
Cestui Que Trust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
