Minnesota Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,869
Ford v. Rardin
as 0:2024cv04533
Respondent:
Jared Rardin
Petitioner:
Francis Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Roulo v. Schnell et al
as 0:2024cv04459
Respondent:
Paul Schnell and Keith Ellison
Petitioner:
Sean William Roulo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kuzmenko v. Warden, FCI Waseca
as 0:2024cv04381
Petitioner:
Vera Kuzmenko
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Waseca
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ohlmeier v. Rardin
as 0:2024cv04382
Respondent:
Warden Jared Rardin
Petitioner:
Todd Allen Ohlmeier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Acuna-Carmona v. FCI Sandstone
as 0:2024cv04372
Respondent:
FCI Sandstone
Petitioner:
Felix Alberto Acuna-Carmona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Maestas v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv04337
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Petitioner:
Elesaio Ben Guzm Maestas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Purdy v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 0:2024cv04340
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons and FCI - Sandstone Warden
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Colin Purdy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reese v. Warden, FCI Sandstone
as 0:2024cv04341
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Sandstone
Petitioner:
Kenny Lee Reed and Gordon David Reese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burns v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv04342
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Petitioner:
Francis Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tejeda v. Bureau of Prisons
as 0:2024cv04343
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Tejeda
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
