US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 10,282
Paul v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Rico Paul
Defendant:
Brian Davis, Caleb Thompson, Justin Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. USA
as 1:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
Dorothy E. Mays
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pollard-El Jr. v. Allen et al
as 4:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Byron Pollard-El Jr.
Defendant:
Richard Adam Allen and Unknown Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chilton v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
Brett Michaels Chilton
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Walker v. Missouri Department of Corrections, Missouri Parole Board
as 1:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
DeMun D. Walker
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Missouri Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Criner v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Phillip Criner
Defendant:
Richard Adams, Samuel Snyder and CO I John Doe Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. St. Louis County et al
as 4:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Vincel Chambers
Defendant:
St. Louis County, 21st Judicial Circuit Court and Wesley Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. USA
as 1:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
Kyle T. Wade
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wright v. Harris
as 4:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Pete Wright
Defendant:
Lane Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bynum v. Osborne
as 4:2024cv00402
Petitioner:
Darryl R. Bynum
Respondent:
Kenneth Osborne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
