U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 1,453
Guillermo Trujillo v. Valdez, et al
as 23-15379
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GUILLERMO CRUZ TRUJILLO
Defendant / Appellee:
VALDEZ, CHAPA and DECLUE
Paul Johnson v. Ronald Broomfield, et al
as 23-15376
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
RONALD BROOMFIELD, Acting Warden and L. TOBIN
Michael Foster v. C. Crosby, et al
as 23-15372
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL BARKARRI FOSTER
Defendant / Appellee:
C. CROSBY, (C.O.), J. PUENTE, (SGT), C. PARRY, (Capt.) and others
Mark Jordan v. BOP
as 23-15373
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Chris Doop v. Wellpath, et al
as 23-15374
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRIS DOOP, No other documents may be filed in this now-closed case per Order, ECF No. 3
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLPATH and STEIN PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL
C. Gilmore v. C. Silva, et al
as 23-15357
Plaintiff / Appellant:
C. DWAYNE GILMORE
Defendant / Appellee:
C. SILVA, Office Technician, Inmate Assignment Office, G. ABDULLAH, Muslin Chaplain, Pelican Bay State Prison, R. LOSACCO, Community Resource Manager, Pelican Bay State Prison and others
Roy Moraga v. Alley, et al
as 23-15360
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY D. MORAGA
Defendant / Appellee:
ALLEY, Dr. and NEVADA, STATE OF
Bryce Jackson v. State of Washington
as 23-35173
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYCE JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Shawn Moore v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15302
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN DALE MOORE
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, Director, CHARLES L RYAN, Former Director, TRUJILLO, Regional Director, Unknown and others
Ernesto Zaragosa-Solis v. M. Gutierrez, et al
as 23-15306
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERNESTO ZARAGOSA-SOLIS
Defendant / Appellee:
M. GUTIERREZ, Warden, CHRISTENSEN, Lt., FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
