Alaska Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Murran v. AK. Department of Corrections
as 3:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Shaun R Murran
Defendant:
AK. Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Febvre
as 3:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Carl K. Thompson
Defendant:
Mary Lee Febvre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Einerson
as 3:2022cv00204
Plaintiff:
Carl K. Thompson
Defendant:
Lynnie Einerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carney v. Lapinskas et al
as 3:2019cv00317
Defendant:
Lapinskas, Ms. Gillmore, Sgt. Ennis and others
Plaintiff:
Cress Carney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stoltenberg et al v. Alaska Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00016
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Garino, Misipati Solaita, Ole Shangin and others
Defendant:
Nighswonger, Alaska Department of Corrections and Nancy Dahlstrom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Eugene Sampo v. Alaska Department of Corrections
as 3:2018cv00141
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Sampo
Defendant:
Alaska Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eclips v. Volland et al
as 3:2018cv00006
Plaintiff:
Luna Eclips
Defendant:
Phillip Volland, Jack Smith, Teaford and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Stavenjord v. Conant et al
as 3:2017cv00203
Plaintiff:
Paul T. Stavenjord
Defendant:
John Conant , Kari Hedgepeth and Clare Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stoltenberg v. State of Alaska, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00171
Plaintiff:
Edwin Allen Stoltenberg
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Department of Corrections, Dean Williams, Shannon McCloud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tholson v. State of Alaska, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
Leon-Michael: Tholson
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Department of Corrections, Jason Marvel, Tonia Enyard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
