California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 120,450
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02647
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Sheldon v. San Quentin Staff et al
as 3:2024cv02627
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Theodore Sheldon
Defendant:
San Quentin Staff, Headquarter Top Secret Torture Room, Torture Squad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Bode
as 3:2024cv02630
Plaintiff:
Jeovani Jackson
Defendant:
Justin Hughes Bode and Ricardo Candela
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Calderon v. Covello
as 2:2024cv01309
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Calderon
Defendant:
P. Covello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Lipsey Jr. v. Lancaster State Prison Warden Lundy et al
as 2:2024cv03716
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lipsey, Jr
Defendant:
Lancaster State Prison Warden Lundy, Captain Z. Soisuvarn, Lieutenant A. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castro v. Gipson et al
as 3:2024cv00789
Defendant:
Surkhi, Connie Gipson, J. Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Castro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Scroggins v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Scroggins
Defendant:
Steve Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Nible v. Macomber et al
as 2:2024cv01259
Plaintiff:
William Lyle Nible
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber and Tommee Dorsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
