US District Court for the District of Oregon Torts - Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 302
Kline v. Brookdale Assisted Living
as 1:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
Mary Kline
Defendant:
Brookdale Assisted Living
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Simon v. Bountiful Company et al
as 3:2024cv00597
Plaintiff:
Jason Lewis Simon
Defendant:
The Bountiful Company, Nordic Naturals, Inc., Pfizer, Inc. and others
Rasmussen v. Powell et al
as 3:2024cv00487
Petitioner:
John Dennis Rasmussen
Respondent:
Debra Powell, Jeff S. Pitzer, Peter M. Grabiel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mangone v. Fitness Equipment Services, LLC
as 3:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Danielle Mangone
Defendant:
Fitness Equipment Services, LLC a Utah limited liability company doing business as Sole Fitness
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Michael of the Bonome family v. The Bonome Living Trust et al
as 3:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Michael of the Bonome family
Defendant:
Bonome Living Trust, Patricia J. Bonome and Bonome L. Gail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Stapleton v. Katstrike, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00097
Defendant:
David P. Stapleton and Katstrike, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Stapleton v. Idanks Limited Liability Company
as 6:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
David P. Stapleton
Defendant:
Idanks LLC and Idanks Limited Liability Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Abarca et al v. AmeriHome Mortgage
as 3:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Monica Rae Abarca and Jose Louis Abarca
Defendant:
AmeriHome Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stapleton v. Twenty-Two Shoes LLC
as 6:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
David P. Stapleton
Defendant:
Twenty-Two Shoes LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Stapleton v. Just My Kicks LLC
as 6:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
David P. Stapleton
Defendant:
Just My Kicks LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
