Washington Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 12,473
Reevis v. Spokane County Superior Court et al
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
Spokane County Superior Court, US District Court, US Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rowley v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00538
Petitioner:
Ryan Rowley
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jupp v. Ferguson
as 2:2024cv00127
Petitioner:
Eugene Alec Jupp
Respondent:
Bob Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garvie v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00531
Petitioner:
Eugene Brian Garvie
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Nguyen v. State of Washington
as 2:2024cv00525
Petitioner:
Anh Vu Nguyen
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nanez v. Sapp et al
as 3:2024cv05293
Plaintiff:
Shawn Dale Nanez
Defendant:
Penelope Sapp, Genie Elton, K. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rouse v. Mason County et al
as 3:2024cv05291
Plaintiff:
Rustin Lee Rouse and Rusty Lee Rouse
Defendant:
Mason County, Randy Newell, Kevin Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michalek v. Hopkins et al
as 3:2024cv05289
Plaintiff:
Brian Judah Michalek
Defendant:
Hopkins, Wright-Brown, Lungsford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynoso v. Welch et al
as 1:2024cv03053
Plaintiff:
Jose Reynoso
Defendant:
Welch, Joseph Brusic and Lisa Rapp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rojas v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05281
Petitioner:
Francisco Salgado Rojas
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
