Ninth Circuit Cases

Cases filed


Cases 21 - 30 of 693,851
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-36017
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Ronnie Clark v. Management Training Corporatio, et al
as 16-17246
Plaintiff - Appellant: RONNIE WAYNE CLARK
Defendant - Appellee: MANAGEMENT TRAINING CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, PAMELA RIDER, Warden, Kingman Hualapai Unit (KHU), HECTOR SANTIAGO, Deputy Warden of Operations, Kingman Complex and others
Jennifer Whalen, et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 16-80184
Plaintiff - Petitioner: JENNIFER WHALEN, THOMAS MITCHELL, GRIF ROSSER and others
Defendant - Respondent: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Phonsavanh Phongmanivan v. Margaret Gilbert
as 16-36018
Petitioner - Appellant: PHONSAVANH PHONGMANIVAN
Respondent - Appellee: MARGARET GILBERT, SCCC Superintendent
Jane Doe No. 14 v. Internet Brands, Inc.
as 16-56808
Plaintiff - Appellant: JANE DOE NO. 14
Defendant - Appellee: INTERNET BRANDS, INC., DBA Modelmayhem.com
USA v. Leonardo Bueno-Saenz
as 16-50470
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: LEONARDO ABAD BUENO-SAENZ
USA v. Wilmer Hernandez
as 16-56805
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: WILMER ALEXIS ERAZO HERNANDEZ, AKA Lacra
Nazie Azam v. FDIC, et al
as 16-56806
Plaintiff - Appellant: NAZIE AZAM
Defendant - Appellee: FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, in the capacity as receiver of Washington Mutual Bank Henderson, Nevada and signatory to Purchase and Assumption Agreement dated September 25, 2008, DOES, 1-20, inclusive
Armah Johnson, et al v. C. Pfeiffer
as 16-56807
Petitioner - Appellant: ARMAH VICTOR JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee: C. PFEIFFER
USA v. Anousone Thongprachanh
as 16-50469
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: ANOUSONE NOI THONGPRACHANH, AKA Noi

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?