US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,216
Donald v. Hamm et al
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Angela Donald
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, John Crow and Gwendolyn Babers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Stallworth et al v. Barton et al
as 2:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Jermari Marshall and Twyla Stallworth
Defendant:
John G. Barton and City of Andalusia, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4311 Uniformed Service Employment/Reemployment Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Robinson v. Brice
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Tonya Robinson
Defendant:
Jay S. Brice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Ivey et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Nancy Buckner, Brandon Hardin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Binion v. City of Clanton et al
as 2:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Binion
Defendant:
City of Clanton, City Council Clanton and Jeff Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
