US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Civil Rights Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 5,008
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Stinson v. Yates et al
as 2:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
Mark T Stinson
Defendant:
John P Yates, Blair, Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2023cv01196
Plaintiff:
Steven R Smith
Defendant:
Arkanas, State of, Pulaski County Arkansas, Does John and Jane 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hall v. Carthers
as 4:2023cv01184
Plaintiff:
Roy Edward Hall
Defendant:
Kelly Carthers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Screeton v. Trinity Multi-Family
as 4:2023cv01187
Plaintiff:
Ralph Byrd Screeton, IV
Defendant:
Trinity Multi-Family
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Williams v. Pulaski, County of et al
as 4:2023cv01169
Plaintiff:
Khakeem Marquis Williams
Defendant:
Pulaski, County of, Eric Higgins, Mark Swaggerty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
