US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16,737
Shoulders v. Hardy et al
as 3:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Roderick Davontae Shoulders
Defendant:
Hardy, Harmon, Musselwhite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kellon v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Lamar Kellon
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Gibson et al
as 4:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
James Gibson, Shipman, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weeks v. Arkansas Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Weeks
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Corrections, Thomas W Hurst, Brandon Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. USA
as 4:2024cv00383
Petitioner:
Antonio Lamont Rice
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Alvarez-Real v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00381
Plaintiff:
Victor Hugo Alvarez-Real
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swanigan v. Musselwhite et al
as 4:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Terry Swanigan
Defendant:
Musselwhite, Fitzpatrick, Mixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barker v. Kelly et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Mark Barker
Defendant:
Morieon Kelly, D Mitchell, Scott Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radford v. Wells et al
as 4:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Tommy Radford
Defendant:
C Wells and C Branham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webster v. Ball
as 4:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Gary Leon Webster
Defendant:
Tom Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
