U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Civil Rights Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 4,376
Thermuthis Lee v. 4326 Broad Street LP, et al
as 17-1106
Plaintiff - Appellant: THERMUTHIS LEE
Defendant - Appellee: 4326 BROAD STREET LP, FRANCISCO MARTINEZ, JOHNSON MARTINEZ and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1067
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Richard Glunk v. R. Noone, et al
as 17-1063
Plaintiff - Appellant: RICHARD P. GLUNK, M.D., F.A.C.S.
Defendant - Appellee: R. BARRETT NOONE, M.D., SCOTT M. GOLDMAN, M.D., MARIE VANBUSKIRK and others
Thermuthis Lee v. Leonard Petrolichio, et al
as 17-1059
Plaintiff - Appellant: THERMUTHIS LEE
Defendant - Appellee: LEONARD PETROLICHIO, ANDREW KENIS, JEANETTE TOMLIN and others
Peter Sauers v. Township of Lower Southampton
as 17-1093
Plaintiff - Appellant: PETER SAUERS
Defendant - Appellee: TOWNSHIP OF LOWER SOUTHAMPTON
Dale Thomas v. John Morganelli, et al
as 17-1060
Plaintiff - Appellant: DALE A. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee: DISTRICT ATTORNEY JOHN MORGANELLI, DETECTIVE FRANCIS JORDAN
Darlene Esposito v. HUD, et al
as 17-1079
Plaintiff - Appellant: DARLENE R. ESPOSITO
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, CHASAN LEYNER & LAMPARELLO, JUDICIAL INTERVENTION PROGRAM NEW YORK SUPREME COURT CIVIL TERM CHIEF CLERK
Darrell Prince v. USA, et al
as 17-1042
Plaintiff - Appellant: DARRELL SANFORD PRINCE
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES CONGRESS, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, UNITED STATES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1041
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1032
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?