US District Court for the District of Columbia Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 526
WU et al v. KEK TRUCKING, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv02892
Not Classified By Court:
YAQUN WU and LAWRENCE WONG
Defendant:
KEK Trucking, INC. and MICHAEL EDWARD DUNN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2022cv02819
Plaintiff:
YAQUN WU, LAWRENCE WONG and NO PARTY
Defendant:
KEK Trucking, INC. and MICHAEL EDWARD DUNN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
AFKHAMI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv02818
Plaintiff:
ALI AFKHAMI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ELROY LEWIS DENNIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
MORTIER v. GEICO
as 1:2022cv02792
Plaintiff:
LISA MORTIER
Defendant:
GEICO
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
JONES v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2022cv02694
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
JORDAN et al V. GUNTHER CHARTERS INC. et al
as 1:2022cv02637
Plaintiff:
Rhatia Downs Jordan and Wali Rashid Jordan
Defendant:
Gunther Charters Inc., Hunt Valley Motor Coach, Inc., K&V LIMOUSINE SERVICE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
DICLEMENTI v. LYFT, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv02634
Plaintiff:
JEANNIE DICLEMENTI
Defendant:
MYONG GUN KIM and LYFT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
SANNI-SANOUSSI v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2022cv02627
Plaintiff:
TAMIRA SANNI-SANOUSSI
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
KEY v. JAIGIRDAR
as 1:2022cv02529
Plaintiff:
DESTINY KEY
Defendant:
JAIGIRDAR MUSTAKIM and MUSTAKIM JAIGIRDAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
PITTMAN v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2022cv02360
Plaintiff:
ELLEN PITTMAN
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
