US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 2,051
HARRELL et al v. ROBINSON
as 3:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
QUINYATLE J HARRELL, DASHONE BURTON, GREENE ALGERNON and others
Defendant:
ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAWKINS-EL v. ANGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. HAWKINS-EL
Defendant:
NATHAN ANGLE and B. MYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. SECREST et al
as 1:2023cv01212
Plaintiff:
MILES ANTHONY THOMAS
Defendant:
ALYSSA SECREST, ANTHONY GIBSON, MR. HARTZELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COUCH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00342
Plaintiff:
JOE DEE COUCH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
CHERRY v. CENTURION LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01175
Plaintiff:
RAH-SHAN S CHERRY and RAH-SHAN CHERRY
Defendant:
CENTURION LLC, DAVIS, MELISSA RUTLEDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VELA v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2023cv00326
Defendant:
FANNELOYD, YOUNG, OLAUF and others
Plaintiff:
RENE VELA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOBBS v. JOHN DOE DEPUTIES et al
as 1:2023cv01088
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER HOBBS
Defendant:
JOHN DOE DEPUTIES, KERRY J. FORESTAL, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TROTTER v. LOGAN et al
as 1:2023cv01065
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY TROTTER
Defendant:
BRANDON LOGAN and CITY OF LAWRENCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MEDCALF v. BREWER
as 2:2023cv00299
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ALLEN MEDCALF
Defendant:
R. BREWER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. KLYAIC et al
as 2:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
ROBYN JOHNSON
Defendant:
OFFICER SUSAN KLYAIC, SERGEANT ALLISON WALKER, BRITTANY COTTRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
