US District Court for the District of Massachusetts Civil Rights Cases

Cases filed
Cases 71 - 80 of 8,485
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv40043
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Harvey v. Brigham & Womens Hospital, Inc.
as 1:2024cv10652
Plaintiff: Regina Harvey
Defendant: Brigham & Womens Hospital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McClintock v. Pollawit
as 3:2024cv30037
Plaintiff: Robert McClintock
Defendant: Poomjal Pollawit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10619
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Conte v. Anasazi Medical Payment Solutions Inc., et al.
as 1:2024cv10605
Plaintiff: Laura Conte
Defendant: Anasazi Medical Payment Solutions Inc. doing business as Advanced Medical Pricing Solutions "AMPS", Cimarron Healthcare Capital and James Nadauld
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Sloan v. Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2024cv10607
Plaintiff: Kendrick Sloan
Defendant: Bureau of Prisons
Bone v. Commonwealth of Massachusettes et al
as 1:2024cv10609
Plaintiff: Elston Bone
Defendant: Commonwealth of Massachusettes, Norfolk County Superior Court, Massachusetts Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10606
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv30031
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10598
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?