US District Court for the District of Massachusetts Civil Rights Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 8,483
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Derusha v. The Department of Children and Families
as 4:2024cv40052
Plaintiff:
Laurie Ann Derusha
Defendant:
The Department of Children and Families
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Affleck v. The Harvard Crimson Inc (Harvard Crimson)
as 1:2024cv10802
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Affleck
Defendant:
The Harvard Crimson Inc (Harvard Crimson)
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 151 Federal Communications Act of 1934
McDowell et al v. Town of Harwich et al
as 1:2024cv10798
Plaintiff:
Patrick McDowell and P.K.M. Contractors, Inc.
Defendant:
Town of Harwich and Mark T. Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv40050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Porter v. Malden District Court et al
as 4:2024cv40048
Plaintiff:
Richard Porter
Defendant:
Malden District Court, Wakefield Police Department, Kathleen Wenzel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv10747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bey v. The United States of America Federal Government
as 1:2024cv10708
Plaintiff:
Cedric Anu Bey
Defendant:
The United States of America Federal Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
