US District Court for the District of Maryland Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 17,214
Johnson v. Lewis et al
as 1:2024cv01316
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Johnson
Defendant:
Sgt. Lewis and CO II Lorke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Turay et al
as 1:2024cv01307
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Thomas
Defendant:
CO II Turay, Sgt. CO III Michael Adelowo, CO II Bayero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. USA - 2255
as 1:2024cv01293
Petitioner:
Thomas Linwood Jones
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Newcomb v. Warden of Kent Co. Det. Center et al
as 1:2024cv01298
Plaintiff:
Dyron S. Newcomb
Defendant:
Warden of Kent Co. Det. Center, John Doe I, John Doe II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Watts v. Thompson et al
as 1:2024cv01300
Plaintiff:
Christopher Maurice Watts
Defendant:
Thompson and PrimeCare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Giangrand
as 1:2024cv01235
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Wilson
Defendant:
Robert Giangrand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gozo v. USA 2255
as 1:2024cv01270
Petitioner:
Makusha Gozo
Respondent:
USA 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Evans v. Sgt. Upole et al
as 1:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Glenn Evans
Defendant:
Sgt. Upole, Ofc. Kock, Sgt. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gross v. USA-2255
as 1:2024cv01247
Petitioner:
Donald Gross
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
