US District Court for the Western District of Michigan Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Davis v. Benson et al
as 1:2020cv00981
Defendant:
Detroit Department of Elections, Janice Winfrey, Jocelyn Benson and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Benson
as 1:2020cv00948
Defendant:
Jocelyn Benson
Plaintiff:
Marian Sheridan, Ruth Johnson and Terri Lynn Land
Petitioner:
Mr. Jim Pedersen, Detroit/Downriver Chapter of the A. Philip Randolph Institute, Mr. Charles Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Public Interest Legal Foundation v. Benson
as 1:2020cv00818
Defendant:
Jocelyn Benson
Plaintiff:
Public Interest Legal Foundation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Benson et al
as 1:2020cv00768
Defendant:
Jocelyn Benson and Mario Morrow
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Daunt v. Benson et al
as 1:2020cv00522
Plaintiff:
Anthony Daunt
Defendant:
Dawn Olney, Nancy Huebel, Jonathan Brater and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FLORES v. SNYDER et al
as 1:2014cv00423
Plaintiff:
JESUS FLORES
Defendant:
RICHARD DALE SNYDER and WILLIAM DUNCAN SCHUETTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
United States of America v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2012cv00788
Defendant:
Michigan, State of , Ruth Johnson and Christopher M. Thomas
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
C-My-Casino, LLC et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2012cv00425
Plaintiff:
C-My-Casino, LLC and Michigan Is Yours
Defendant:
Ruth Johnson, Melissa Malerman and State Board of Canvassers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Hayes v. Michigan Democratic Party et al
as 1:2007cv01237
Plaintiff:
Martha Hayes
Defendant:
Michigan Democratic Party, Michigan, State of and Terri Lynn Land
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Bennink et al v. Coopersville, City of et al
as 5:2006cv00082
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
