US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Contract Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 57
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY V. SOLEIL ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC, ET AL.
as 1:2017cv00481
Plaintiff:
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY
Defendant:
SOLEIL ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC , MCALEE LEMENE and KRISTINA LEMENE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES V. NATIONWIDE ADVANTAGE MORTGAGE COMPANY
as 1:2017cv00189
Plaintiff:
JONES, DEVON V.
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE ADVANTAGE MORTGAGE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TD BANK, N.A. v. JAY JALA BAPA,.L.C. et al
as 1:2016cv00823
Plaintiff:
TD BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
JAY JALA BAPA, L.L.C., SHILA BANKIM RANA, DOLI RANA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALL V. LANGDON
as 1:2015cv00731
Plaintiff:
STEVEN B. WALL
Defendant:
TRAJAN LANGDON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CUMMINGS v. POWELL et al
as 1:2015cv00545
Plaintiff:
JOHN D. CUMMINGS
Defendant:
CATHY POWELL, CROSS POINT CHURCH OF GREENSBORO, CLINT S. MORSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TD BANK, N.A. v. Page Hill, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00488
Plaintiff:
TD BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
PAGE HILL, LLC, MELLOW IN THE PINES, LLC, RICHARD C. CRAVEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HORRY COUNTY STATE BANK v. THOMAS, JR.
as 1:2015cv00009
Plaintiff:
HORRY COUNTY STATE BANK
Defendant:
SAMUEL C. THOMAS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
HORRY COUNTY STATE BANK v. THOMAS, JR.
as 1:2015cv00009
Plaintiff:
HORRY COUNTY STATE BANK
Defendant:
SAMUEL C. THOMAS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
CAPITAL BANK, N.A. v. MCHONE ET AL
as 1:2014cv01076
Plaintiff:
CAPITAL BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
DANIEL MCHONE and DENISE REAVIS MCHONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ELLISON v. HSBC et al
as 1:2014cv00958
Defendant:
HSBC , CLARK PARTNERS REALTY and PONTUS INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO I, LLC
Plaintiff:
GARLAND C. ELLISON
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
