US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Cases 151 - 160 of 227,899
VARGAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv06693
Plaintiff:
MAXIMINO VARGAS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
74-78 MAPLE AVENUE, LLC v. TOWNSHIP OF PLUMSTED et al
as 3:2024cv06626
Plaintiff:
74-78 MAPLE AVENUE, LLC
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF PLUMSTED and TOWNSHIP OF PLUMSTED LAND USE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
EDUCATIONAL CREDIT MANAGMENT CORP. v. BUDGICK
as 3:2023cv21341
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
PROTOPAPAS et al v. WHITTAKER, CLARK & DANIELS, INC.
as 3:2023cv04151
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
GILKISON et al v. SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
as 3:2024cv06621
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM GILKISON and KATHERINE GILKISON
Defendant:
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
CLYCE v. LIFECELL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv06606
Plaintiff:
DONNA CLYCE
Defendant:
LIFECELL CORPORATION and ALLERGAN USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SM MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION, AS ASSIGNEE OF HIDALGO COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES FOUNDATION v. CARE IMPROVEMENT PLUS
as 3:2024cv06607
Plaintiff:
SM MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION, AS ASSIGNEE OF HIDALGO COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES FOUNDATION doing business as SOUTH TEXAS AIRMED
Defendant:
CARE IMPROVEMENT PLUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
THOMAS v. LIFECELL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv06585
Plaintiff:
TINA THOMAS
Defendant:
LIFECELL CORPORATION and ALLERGAN USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FOLEY v. CIGNA GROUP et al
as 1:2024cv06641
Plaintiff:
DENISE FOLEY
Defendant:
CIGNA GROUP, CIGNA HEALTHCARE and HEALTHSPRING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
