US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 11,821
SMITH v. PHILLIPS ASSCOCIATES, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
ROSETTA SMITH
Defendant:
PHILLIPS ASSOCIATES INC. and PHILLIPS & ASSOCIATES INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
HOPE HOUSE IN MIDLAND PA v. BOROUGH OF MIDLAND
as 2:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
HOPE HOUSE IN MIDLAND PA
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF MIDLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Drumm v. BEAVER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Shyler Drumm
Defendant:
BEAVER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, Jeffrey Beltz and Nicholas Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
