US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,577
Howard v. TBI et al
as 3:2024cv00548
Plaintiff:
William Howard
Defendant:
TBI, FSP Nashville, Chelsea M. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Reeners v. McCormick et al
as 3:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jayson Reeners
Defendant:
Nekeisha Bryant McCormick, Gregory Traylor, Alegra Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Howard v. Rescue Mission et al
as 3:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
William Howard
Defendant:
Rescue Mission and Room In The Inn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00554
Plaintiff:
Joe Doe
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reguli et al v. Hetzel et al
as 3:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Connie Reguli and Wendy Hancock
Defendant:
Tracy Hetzel, Estate of Kimberly Helper, Mary Katherine Evins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #1 (JRC) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (JRC), John Doe #2 (TJC), John Doe #3 (RKF) and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dowlen v. The City of Springfield, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Kierra Lachelle Dowlen
Defendant:
The City of Springfield, Tennessee and John Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #062 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
John Doe #062
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. City of Franklin, Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Timothy Brown
Defendant:
City of Franklin, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
