US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Civil Rights Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 4,766
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Moss v. Robroy Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Ann Moss
Defendant:
Robroy Industries, Inc. and Robroy Industries-Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Gierlichs v. Gierlichs
as 6:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Tom Bubertus Gierlichs
Defendant:
Jessica Anne Gierlichs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fiorillo v. Tractor Supply Company
as 1:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
John Fiorillo
Defendant:
Tractor Supply Company
Cross Defendant:
WERNER CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Retaliation Wrongful Termination
Phillips et al v. County Of Smith et al Case electronically transferred to Eastern District of Texas-Tyler.
as 6:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Derek-Lee Phillips and Cody-Storm Voss
Respondent:
County of Smith, Johnathan Peters, Riley Rugg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Johnson v. City of Marshall, Texas
as 2:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Garnett Johnson
Defendant:
City of Marshall, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
