US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 22,813
Oceguera v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00049
Petitioner:
Jonothan Giovanni Oceguera
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wolfford v. Ivey et al
as 9:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Nickolas Wolfford
Defendant:
Ronald Ivey, Sonnia Navarrete, Randi Furbee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burke v. Director, TDCJ-CID ***CASE TRANSFERRED TO LUFKIN***
as 6:2024cv00123
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman, Jr. v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Edward James Coleman, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00124
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00073
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberson v. USA
as 9:2024cv00060
Petitioner:
Taurus Roberson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Kindred v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00124
Petitioner:
Herman Lee Kindred
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kindred v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00125
Petitioner:
Herman Lee Kindred
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
