US District Court for the Northern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 197
Ellis v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Priscilla Ellis
Defendant:
United States of America, Evertt Cottrell, Attorney General Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alfano v. Allred Unit Mailroom
as 3:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Richard Alfano
Defendant:
Allred Unit Mailroom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. FCI Seagoville et al
as 3:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Jua-Deno Peterson, Jr
Defendant:
FCI Seagoville, FNU Rivers, A Greenfeild and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. Akinode et al
as 7:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Daniel D Dillard
Defendant:
Sergeants Oluyemi Akinode, Daniel B. Manyango, Obadina S. Omoaka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Urquhart v. 371st District Court et al
as 4:2023cv01198
Plaintiff:
Naheem Shamaar Urquhart
Defendant:
371st District Court and Arlington Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrison v. Doe 3:23-cv-2190
as 3:2023cv02190
Plaintiff:
Bobby Morrison
Defendant:
John Doe 3:23-cv-2190
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrison v. Doe 3:23-cv-2190
as 7:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Bobby Morrison
Defendant:
John Doe 3:23-cv-2190
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Busby v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 7:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ladon Busby
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trove v. Unknown
as 3:2023cv01951
Plaintiff:
Erik Thor Trove
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dingler v. Cooper et al
as 4:2023cv00865
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dingler
Defendant:
D'Andrea Cooper and Tarrant County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
