US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Cases 71 - 80 of 68,596
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ramos et al v. Towers Construction, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00693
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ramos and Christian Aguilar
Defendant:
Towers Construction, LLC, Carpentry Services, Inc. and Hitt Contracting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Cypress v. Evans et al
as 2:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Penny Cypress
Defendant:
James A. Evans and Virginia Housing Loan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Northern Virginia Properties, Inc. v. Truist Financial Corporation
as 1:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
Northern Virginia Properties, Inc.
Defendant:
Truist Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Puller v. Garcia et al
as 3:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Toccara Y. Puller
Defendant:
Lt. Garcia and Lt. Howerton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
