US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Cases 51 - 60 of 25,061
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Hubbard v. Duffield Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Hubbard
Defendant:
Duffield Jail, Nurse B. Carroll and R.N.P. Audia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ehrgott v. Walmart, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Jean Ehrgott
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Vega v. Amurcon Realty Company et al
as 6:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Frank Vega
Defendant:
Amurcon Realty Company, Micheal Barnes, Rebecca Cannady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Greenbrier Hotel Corporation et al v. Carter Bank & Trust et al
as 4:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Greenbrier Hotel Corporation, James C. Justice Companies, Inc., Twin Fir Estates, LLC and others
Defendant:
Carter Bank & Trust, Carter Bankshares, Inc., Litz H. Van Dyke and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1972 Typing Arrangement Act
Carter v. Rosch et al
as 7:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Defendant:
Kyle Rosch, Keith Almarode, Melissa Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paschall v. University of Virginia School of Medicine | Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Hillary Knicely Paschall
Defendant:
University of Virginia School of Medicine | Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Li v. Chung LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jianxin Li
Defendant:
Chung LLC doing business as Chung's Barber Shop and Stanley Chung
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
