US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Cases 61 - 70 of 15,265
O'kane, Jason v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Jason C. O'kane
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Buck, Randy v. BNSF Railway Company
as 3:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Randy Buck
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Hauke, Joseph v. State of Wisconsin
as 3:2024cv00233
Petitioner:
Joseph J. Hauke
Defendant:
Gregory A. Parker, Mathew Kolell, Chris Madle and others
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mecum, Michael v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Michael Mecum
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Divelbiss, Randin v. Wollin, Sam et al
as 3:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Randin Divelbiss
Defendant:
Chief Sam Wollin, Officer Smith and Adams Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Divelbiss, Randin v. McFarland
as 3:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Randin Divelbiss
Defendant:
Deputy McFarland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lopez, Ted v. Tegels, Lizzie
as 3:2024cv00223
Petitioner:
Ted Lopez
Respondent:
Lizzie Tegels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kuslits, John et al v. Brown, Nicole et al
as 3:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
John Kuslits and Kendrick Dane Sellers
Defendant:
Nicole Brown, Maryah Martin, Denise Valerius and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
