US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 1,762
Ramirez-Verduzco v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00520
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Ramirez-Verduzco
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
McArthur v. Superintendent
as 2:2023cv00507
Plaintiff:
Terrance A. McArthur
Defendant:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberts v. Holzapel
as 5:2023cv00496
Petitioner:
Phillip Roberts
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard and W. Holzapel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cloud v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00498
Petitioner:
Fred Cloud
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wade v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00492
Petitioner:
John Wade
Respondent:
Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Anderson v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023cv00490
Petitioner:
Dewayne Anderson
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Damone v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00482
Petitioner:
Lindsey Damone
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bennett v. Warden FCI Beckley
as 5:2023cv00477
Petitioner:
Marcus Bennett
Respondent:
FCI Beckley and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dickens v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00473
Petitioner:
Gary Dickens
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Floyd v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00472
Petitioner:
Johnny D. Floyd, Sr.
Respondent:
K. Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
