US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 1,758
Laurian-Matuz v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00607
Petitioner:
Pedro L. Laurian-Matuz
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Whitted v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00605
Petitioner:
Jamaica Dajuan Whitted
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Johnson v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00602
Petitioner:
Aabrial L. Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Carpenter v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00600
Petitioner:
Stephanie L. Carpenter
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Steelman v. Warden
as 5:2023cv00599
Petitioner:
Robert Keith Steelman
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dampier v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00592
Petitioner:
Donald H. Dampier, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Martinez-Turcio v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00593
Petitioner:
Javier Martinez-Turcio
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Grant v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00586
Petitioner:
Tanya Parrish Grant
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hicks v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00581
Petitioner:
Eric Hicks
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cox v. Ames
as 2:2023cv00577
Petitioner:
Christopher Cox
Respondent:
Donald F. Ames
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
