US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 1,789
Horton v. Carter et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00785
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Horton
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Steven T. Marshall and Karen Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00749
Plaintiff:
Kevin Willie Williams
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones, Steven T. Marshall and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Busby v. Cohen (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00745
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Busby
Defendant:
Alan Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Buchanon v. Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2021cv00737
Plaintiff:
Terry James Buchanon, II
Defendant:
Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles, Lynn Head, Sarah C. Still and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pearson v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00656
Plaintiff:
Clinton James Pearson, Jr.
Defendant:
Ellen Brooks, John Hartley, Steven T. Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Greer-El v. Baldwin et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00653
Plaintiff:
Jerome Greer-El
Defendant:
Jeffery Baldwin, Steven T. Marshall, Supreme Court of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Givens v. Headley et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00611
Plaintiff:
John Henry Givens
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holloway v. Lockhart et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2021cv00605
Plaintiff:
Michael Jerome Holloway
Defendant:
Sid Lockhart and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dowdell v. Headley et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00588
Plaintiff:
Kirston Jermaine Dowdell
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dowdell v. Headley et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2021cv00588
Plaintiff:
Kirston Jermaine Dowdell
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley, Steven T. Marshall and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
