U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 1,387
Currington v. Soltys (INMATE 1)

as 1:2021cv00550
Plaintiff:
DeAndre D. Currington
Defendant:
Scott Soltys and Community Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crutchfield v. Fleiner et al (INMATE 3)

as 2:2021cv00515
Plaintiff:
Barney Crutchfield
Defendant:
Stacey Fleiner, D. Taylor, Kalvin Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dortch v. Harris (INMATE 2)

as 2:2021cv00512
Plaintiff:
Harold L. Dortch
Defendant:
Cpt. Harriss and Laquanda Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huntington v. Brazier et al (INMATE 1)

as 1:2021cv00424
Defendant:
Jason Smoak, James Brazier, CO Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Huntington and David Wayne Huntington, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Calhoun et al (INMATE 3)

as 2:2021cv00405
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, A W E. Villareal, David Brewer and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Marshall et al (INMATE 2)

as 2:2021cv00391
Defendant:
Delores Woodham, Steven T. Marshall, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Mack Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashmore v. White et al (INMATE 1)

as 3:2021cv00390
Defendant:
Brandon Hutto, Shane Healey, Det. Amerson and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Maurice Ashmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Trawick (INMATE 1)

as 1:2021cv00392
Defendant:
Lt. Trawick and Mark Trawick
Plaintiff:
Kyle Jared Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashmore v. Lee County Dentention Center et al (INMATE 2)

as 3:2021cv00389
Defendant:
Steward Hill, Lt. Jones, Lee County Dentention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Maurice Ashmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 3)

as 2:2021cv00379
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Patrice Richie Jones, Steven T. Marshall and others
Plaintiff:
Clinton James Pearson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.