US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 4,303
Brewster v. Noble (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00429
Plaintiff:
Gerald Dewayne Brewster
Defendant:
Officer Noble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wehunt v. Harrison (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00424
Plaintiff:
Joel Henry Wehunt
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00425
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Officer Underwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tartt v. Whynott et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
Fernando Tartt
Defendant:
Christine Whynott and Ionathor Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sexton v. Bond et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00408
Plaintiff:
Glenn Ray Sexton
Defendant:
Danny Bond and Melondy Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Jenkins et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00404
Plaintiff:
Garon McKenzie Morgan
Defendant:
Clatys Jenkins, Larry McCovery and John Pryor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Gordy et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Garon McKenzie Morgan
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy, Larry McCovery and Bryan Gavins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Williams et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lee Wells, Sr.
Defendant:
Karen Williams and Sgt. Casino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Carter et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Garon McKenzie Morgan
Defendant:
Karen Carter, Clatys Jenkins, Laveta Boben and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Holland (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Garon McKenzie Morgan
Defendant:
Mrs. Holland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
