Alaska Contract Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 367
Girl Scouts of the USA v. Farthest North Girl Scout Council
as 3:2021cv00166
Plaintiff:
Girl Scouts of the USA
Defendant:
Farthest North Girl Scout Council
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Mark Fairchild Logging, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00015
Defendant:
Mark Fairchild Logging, LLC and Carl Mark Fairchild
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burnett v. Central Bank of Belize et al
as 3:2021cv00144
Defendant:
Central Bank of Belize and Gustavo Manuel Vasquez
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Burnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Madsen et al v. Jacoby et al
as 3:2021cv00123
Plaintiff:
Stephan Lake Holdings, LLC and Stephan Lake Adventures, LLC
Defendant:
Kaylee Lamae Jacoby
Counter Claimant:
Russell Lee Jacoby, Jacob Lee Jacoby, Laura Mae Jacoby and others
Counter Defendant:
John Madsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Erickson et al v. Pfeister et al
as 1:2021cv00009
Defendant:
Joe Markey, Bruce Tenney, Patricia A. Pfeister individually doing business as ACP doing business as ACP, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Walt Coram, Creed Coram and Joan Erickson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boom Boys Cranes, LLC v. Hamilton Construction, L.L.C.
as 3:2021cv00062
Defendant:
Hamilton Construction, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Boom Boys Cranes, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watterson Construction Co. v. International Door, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00047
Defendant:
International Door, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Watterson Construction Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beltz v. M&C Hotel Interests, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00039
Plaintiff:
Greg Beltz
Defendant:
M&C Hotel Interests, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ketchikan Indian Community v. Cochran et al
as 3:2021cv00028
Defendant:
Norris Cochran, Elizabeth Fowler and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Ketchikan Indian Community
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
