US District Court for the District of Arizona Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 891 - 900 of 33,373
Eash v. Arizona Department of Corrections
as 4:2023cv00395
Plaintiff:
Christopher Albert Eash
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Escobar v. Irby et al
as 2:2023cv01740
Plaintiff:
Michael D Escobar
Defendant:
Irene Barron Irby, Unknown Navarro, Unknown Raymer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Quiroz v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv01728
Plaintiff:
Maria Carmen Quiroz
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Dawn Noggle and Clint Hickman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fantel v. White et al
as 2:2023cv01725
Plaintiff:
Clifford John Fantel, Jr.
Defendant:
Julia White, Scott Nieman, Dean Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ochoa #155345 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv01734
Plaintiff:
Arthur Antonio Ochoa
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Unknown Perea, Unkown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dale v. Penzone
as 2:2023cv01722
Plaintiff:
Ashlie Leighann Dale
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duran #199808 v. Cell Trees Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv01738
Plaintiff:
Peter Duran
Defendant:
Cell Trees Incorporated and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Velez v. Peters et al
as 4:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Robert Velez
Defendant:
Colette S Peters and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Thompson #313944 v. NaphCare Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv01720
Plaintiff:
Vincent Bernard Thompson, Jr.
Defendant:
NaphCare Incorporated and Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guillen v. Penzone
as 2:2023cv01730
Plaintiff:
Janette Guillen
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
