Arizona Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 17,199
Jones #326158 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00967
Plaintiff:
Melanie L Jones
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Centurion Healthcare, NaphCare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baeza #341039 v. Unknown Parties
as 2:2024cv00970
Plaintiff:
Leonard Baeza
Defendant:
Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crago #115357 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00942
Plaintiff:
Earl Felton Crago, Jr.
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell and Derric Keaton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fulmer v. Skinner et al
as 2:2024cv00936
Plaintiff:
Imani Renee Fulmer
Defendant:
Russell Skinner, Maricopa County Sheriff's Department, Maricopa County Estrella Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kepler et al v. NaphCare Incorporated et al
as 4:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Karina Kepler, Carlin Casey and Mary Hutchinson
Defendant:
NaphCare Incorporated, Pima, County of, Chris Nanos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith #299789 v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00931
Plaintiff:
Addinika A Smith
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith #299789 v. Kraft
as 2:2024cv00929
Plaintiff:
Addinika Ariel Smith
Defendant:
Brandon Kraft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roseberry #178096 v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00927
Plaintiff:
Homer R Roseberry
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams #218584 v. Otter et al
as 2:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
Jeremy J Williams
Defendant:
N Otter, Unknown Valasco, Unknown Bravo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Osirio #307582 v. Prochko
as 2:2024cv00900
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Rae Osirio, Jr.
Defendant:
Tara Prochko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
