US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 16,754
Sparks v. Cross County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Leonard Ellis Sparks
Defendant:
Cross County Jail, Arleen Clements and Does Cam, C. O., Cross County Jail; and Matt, C. O. Cross County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Pulaski County Circuit Court
as 4:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Tilon Monta Mitchell, Jr
Defendant:
Pulaski County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly v. USA
as 2:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Larry W Kelly, Jr
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lambert v. Arkansas, State of
as 3:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Dorletha Lambert
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
George Eli Brown
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Cox v. Jefferson et al
as 3:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Melvin Cox
Defendant:
Christopher Jefferson, Bailey and Vamhouten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Double Tree Parking Garage et al
as 4:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Double Tree Parking Garage, East End Towing, PPP Grants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Langley et al
as 4:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Payne, III
Defendant:
Tammy Langley and Turn Key Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Jacinto Martinez
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Levac v. Haney
as 4:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Daniel Levac
Defendant:
Sarah Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
