US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 44
USA v. $1,789,520.00 In U S Currency
as 4:2014cv00634
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$1,789,520.00 In U S Currency
Claimant:
Walda Luna
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. $189,180.00 in US Currency et al
as 4:2014cv00482
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$189,180.00 in US Currency and $1,000.00 in US Currency
Claimant:
Josiah McDonald and Jamie Mason
Counter_claimant:
Josiah McDonald
Counter_defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. $62,135.00 in United States Currency
as 4:2014cv00300
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$62,135.00 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. $431,830.00 in United States Currency
as 4:2014cv00273
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$431,830.00 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. $50,000.00 in United States Currency
as 4:2013cv00040
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$50,000.00 in United States Currency
Claimant:
John Bayron Pajon
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. $2,306,345.00 in United States Currency
as 4:2013cv00041
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$2,306,345.00 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. Nissan Quest 2005 VIN #5N1BV28U25N133247
as 4:2012cv00193
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Nissan Quest 2005 VIN #5N1BV28U25N133247
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. Dodge Intrepid 2000 VIN #2B3HD56J8YH174833
as 4:2011cv00488
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Dodge Intrepid 2000 VIN #2B3HD56J8YH174833
Claimant:
Kenneth Ray Irvin
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. Cadillac Escalade 2004 VIN #1GYEK63N74R122912
as 4:2011cv00198
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Cadillac Escalade 2004 VIN #1GYEK63N74R122912
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. $25900 in U S. Currency
as 4:2010cv01119
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$25900 in U S. Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
