California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 56,580
Alldredge
as 4:2025cv01563
Petitioner:
Joseph Alldredge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coronado Morales v. Bondi et al
as 3:2025cv00334
Petitioner:
Jorge Hugo Coronado Morales
Respondent:
Pam Bondi, Ronald L. Davis, Benjamine Huffman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
R. A. v. Henn et al
as 2:2025at00225
Petitioner:
R. A.
Respondent:
Chris Henn and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Kelly v. Newsom et al
as 1:2025cv00204
Petitioner:
James Carl Kelly
Respondent:
Gavin Newsom, Pat Horn and J. Moeckly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Wren v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2025cv00205
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Charles Wren
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Collins v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2025cv00206
Petitioner:
Dentrell Collins
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valdez v. Santa Cruz Superior Court et al
as 3:2025cv01369
Petitioner:
Ismael Valdez
Respondent:
Santa Cruz Superior Court and Santa Cruz PD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haller v. Bonta et al
as 8:2025cv00297
Petitioner:
David Lee Haller
Respondent:
Rob Bonta and Todd Spitzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Diaz v. Gamboa

as 1:2025cv00196
Petitioner:
Joaquin Diaz
Respondent:
Martin Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Iseli v. The State of California
as 3:2025cv01463
Petitioner:
Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent:
The State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.