US District Court for the District of Connecticut Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,128
Aponte v. Osborn Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2024cv01861
Defendant:
Scott Semple and Osborn Correctional Institution
Plaintiff:
Almando Aponte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pennywell et al v. Osborn Institutional Facility et al
as 3:2024cv01871
Defendant:
Osborn Institutional Facility and Semple
Plaintiff:
Toliver and Coty Pennywell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pedreira v. Pearson et al
as 3:2024cv01875
Plaintiff:
David Pedreira
Defendant:
Dougherty, Gagne and Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rispoli v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv01842
Defendant:
Maldonado, Carol Cepelak, Gero and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Rispoli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Napolitano v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv01854
Defendant:
James Dzureuda, Scott Semple, Carol Cepelak and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Napolitano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roger v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv01849
Defendant:
Carol Cepelak, Roy, Gero and others
Plaintiff:
Kennith Roger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strickland v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv01823
Plaintiff:
Shaquil Strickland
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Gero, Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Groman v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv01814
Plaintiff:
Robert Groman
Defendant:
Carol Cepelak, Gero, James Dzurenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zelinsky v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv01764
Plaintiff:
Peter Zelinsky
Defendant:
Washington, Angel Quiros, Grady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mohammed v. FCI Danbury et al
as 3:2024cv01773
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCI Danbury, Dukate and others
Plaintiff:
Aleah Mohammed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
