US District Court for the District of Columbia Social Security Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 623
MYERS v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv02392
Plaintiff:
SANDY MYERS
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
LORENZ v. U.S. DISTRICT COURT et al
as 1:2019cv02420
Defendant:
SHAUN SHUMAKER and U.S. DISTRICT COURT
Plaintiff:
ANGELA MARIE LORENZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
WATSON v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2019cv02387
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
CURTIS LEE WATSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LIGHTFOOT-TALLEY v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv02242
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
CHANELL LIGHTFOOT-TALLEY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LEWIS v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv02059
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
NOVLETTE YVONNE LEWIS
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CARTER v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv02049
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
TOMMY CARTER
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
MERSHMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2019cv02007
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
JAMES BERN MERSHMAN
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RICHMOND-HOWARD v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv02014
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
SHEILA MARIE RICHMOND-HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
JOHNSON v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv01950
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
FRANCES JOHNSON
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SOPHUS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2019cv01919
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS SOPHUS
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
