US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia

Cases filed
Cases 31 - 40 of 26,117
TURNER v. MAHAMAT et al
as 5:2024cv00056
Plaintiff: TURNER CHERITA
Defendant: IBRAHIM MAHAMAT, DMN TRANSPORT, INC and NATIONAL INTERSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
WYMER v. DOE
as 5:2024cv00055
Plaintiff: JAMES WYMER
Defendant: JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00026
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
NATALIE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv00053
Plaintiff: CHAMBLISS NATALIE
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00052
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00051
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00050
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00021
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SMITH v. SAMPSON
as 5:2024cv00048
Petitioner: EVERETT SMITH
Respondent: GREGORY SAMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROSE-BURRELL v. CITY OF MONROE et al
as 3:2024cv00011
Plaintiff: LALLYMAY ROSE-BURREL
Defendant: CITY OF MONROE, NICHOLAS SILVERBERG and OFFICER RYAN GEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?