US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Cases 81 - 90 of 21,617
Simpson v. Harmon et al
as 3:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Gregory Simpson
Defendant:
Investigator Harmon and Ms. Flemming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Call v. Janus RX LLC
as 4:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Brooke Call
Defendant:
Janus RX LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ALSTON v. COASTAL STATE PRISON et al
as 4:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Dennis Alston
Defendant:
Coastal State Prison, JOHN AND OR JANE DOE and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockhart v. Mims
as 1:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Shawn Lockhart
Respondent:
Warden Charles Mims
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Richmond v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Travis Shantez Richmond
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Detherage v. Triplett et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Joshua Detherage
Defendant:
John E. Triplett and Elizabeth N. Slater
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v. Burist et al
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Jessica Davenport
Defendant:
Nicholas Burist and Mayflower Transit, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
Burroughs v. Wells Fargo Mortgage
as 4:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
William S. Burroughs
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
