Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 39,538
ALSTON v. COASTAL STATE PRISON et al
as 4:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Dennis Alston
Defendant:
Coastal State Prison, JOHN AND OR JANE DOE and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Rice v. Oliver et al
as 4:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Rice
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver and Christopher M Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKINNEY v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE LAMONTE MCKINNEY, JR.
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, Warden ANTOINE CALDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockhart v. Mims
as 1:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Shawn Lockhart
Respondent:
Warden Charles Mims
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dorsey v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv01410
Plaintiff:
Julius Dorsey
Defendant:
Russell W. Smith and Chan B. Caudell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holliman v. Oliver et al
as 4:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Octavius Holliman
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Joshua Jones, Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Vlasenko
as 4:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Morieo Austin
Defendant:
Dr. Vlasenko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PASCHAL v. AUGUSTA STATE MEDICAL PRISON
as 7:2024cv00030
Petitioner:
CHARLES A PASCHAL, JR
Respondent:
AUGUSTA STATE MEDICAL PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOWMAN v. JONES et al
as 4:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
ERICK DAWAYNE BOWMAN
Respondent:
JONES, WILLIE WILSON and RUTLEDGE STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
